English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 43312/67235
Visitors : 2027602      Online Users : 3
RC Version 5.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU/NCHU Library IR team.
National Chung Hsing University Institutional Repository - NCHUIR > 法政學院 > 法律學系 > 依資料類型分類 > 碩博士論文 >  優先權關於「相同發明」之要件審查基準之探討

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nchuir.lib.nchu.edu.tw/handle/309270000/153043

標題: 優先權關於「相同發明」之要件審查基準之探討
Study on Assessment Standards for Identity Requirement of Priority Right
作者: 陳淵慎
Chen, Yuan-Shen
Contributors: 許舜喨
法律學系科技法律碩士班
關鍵字: 專利優先權;相同發明要件;審查基準;申請專利範圍
priority right of patents;identity requirement of priority right;assessment standards;claims
日期: 2013
Issue Date: 2013-11-18 11:51:59 (UTC+8)
Publisher: 法律學系科技法律碩士班
摘要: 本論文主要在於研究發明專利優先權關於「相同發明」要件之審查規範,更進一步地說,在於探討優先權「相同發明」要件現行審查規範之合理性。
首先本論文介紹我國以及中國、日本及歐洲專利局之發明優先權制度,以及優先權「相同發明」要件之審查基準。其中,在我國優先權「相同發明」要件審查基準之部分,本論文佐以申請專利範之結構解釋「相同發明」要件現行之判斷方法。
其次,本論文探討申請人主張優先權之目的,並分析提出部分優先權之申請專利範圍態樣,再以現行「相同發明」要件審查基準適用於該等態樣,最後探究適用結果是否符合申請人之目的。再者,本論文從歐洲專利局技術上訴委員會不同於現行審查基準上訴決定,分析其主張及理由,並從歐洲專利局擴大上訴委員會之解釋意見中,分析其最終見解及理由。
最後,本論文綜合申請人主張優先權之目的,以及歐洲專利局技術上訴委員會及擴大上訴委員會之解釋意見,提出本論文之建議。
This thesis is to study the assessment standards for identity requirement of priority right of patents, and more particularly to discuss the rationality of the current assessment standards in this domain.

This thesis starts from introducing the priority right systems and the assessment standards for identity requirement of priority right of patents in Taiwan, China, Japan, and European Patent Office. And while expounding the assessment standards of Taiwan, we explain the current judging rules for identity requirement through the structures of patent claims.

Next, we discuss the purposes why applicants claim their priority rights, analyze the structures of patent claims for claiming partial priority right, and then study if the result satisfies the purposes of the applicants.

Furthermore, according to the appeal decisions made by the EPO’s technical boards of appeal which disagree the current assessment standards, we analyze the viewpoints and reasons of the technical boards of appeal, and then based on the explanation provided by the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal, we analyze the final viewpoints and reasons again.

This thesis combines the purposes for applicants to claim their priority rights and the explanation of EPO’s technical boards of appeal and Enlarged Board of Appeal, and at last we provide our own suggestions.
Appears in Collections:[依資料類型分類] 碩博士論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML305View/Open


 


學術資源

著作權聲明

本網站為收錄中興大學學術著作及學術產出,已積極向著作權人取得全文授權,並盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益。如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員,將盡速為您處理。

本網站之數位內容為國立中興大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用。

聯絡網站維護人員:wyhuang@nchu.edu.tw,04-22840290 # 412。

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU/NCHU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback