English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 43312/67235
Visitors : 2077141      Online Users : 3
RC Version 5.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU/NCHU Library IR team.
National Chung Hsing University Institutional Repository - NCHUIR > 法政學院 > 法律學系 > 依資料類型分類 > 碩博士論文 >  新聞自由與隱私權衝突之研究 以司法院釋字第689號解釋為中心

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nchuir.lib.nchu.edu.tw/handle/309270000/153068

標題: 新聞自由與隱私權衝突之研究 以司法院釋字第689號解釋為中心
The Conflict of Freedom of Press and the Right to Privacy-A Study from the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 689
作者: 張志光
Chang, Chih-Kuang
Contributors: 李惠宗
Hwai-Tzong Lee
法律學系碩士在職專班
關鍵字: 新聞自由;隱私權;人肉搜索;隱私之合理期待;基本權衝突;公眾人物;資訊自決權;知的權利;制度性保障;媒體自律
Freedom of the Press;Right to Privacy;The Cyber Cannibal;Reasonable Expectation of Privacy;Conflict of the Constitutional Rights;Public figure;Recht auf informationelle Selbeststimmung;People’s Right to Know;Insistutional Guarantee;Media Self-Discipline
日期: 2013
Issue Date: 2013-11-18 13:39:50 (UTC+8)
Publisher: 法律學系碩士在職專班
摘要: 新聞自由與隱私權此二基本權衝突之問題,有許多不同層面之影響。針對不斷進步的科技與傳播媒介,對於個人隱私上之侵害態樣亦不同於以往,特別是「媒體跟追採訪」及「人肉搜索」等議題。本文從此二權利之基礎理論與發展,加以分析與探討該基本權之本質,再就該基本權衝突問題研究其權利之保護範圍予以討論。於兩者間之權衡,在不造成另一權利之減損或侵害原則下,如何使其發揮最大之保護效益,仍值深入探討。此外,本文參考德國、美國法案例,並以司法院釋字第689號解釋為中心,試圖找出「利益衡量」與「個案衡量」之司法違憲審查標準。
Freedom of the press and privacy are contradictory issues of two fundamental right, and the issues effect wild expect. In the face of the continuous progress on technology and media, infringement models on privacy have been also different from the past, especially about the cyber cannibal. From the fundemental theory of these two rights, this paper aims at analyzing the nature of rights; furthermore, from the contradictory issues caused by the overlapping part, we study the purpose of rights protection and weights between these two rights. Without impairing or infringing the other rights, how to make the best protection and benefits is worth the in-depth exploration. Otherwise, this paper cited the case from America and Germany, studied The Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 689 and try to find the judicial review how it works.
Appears in Collections:[依資料類型分類] 碩博士論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML169View/Open


 


學術資源

著作權聲明

本網站為收錄中興大學學術著作及學術產出,已積極向著作權人取得全文授權,並盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益。如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員,將盡速為您處理。

本網站之數位內容為國立中興大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用。

聯絡網站維護人員:wyhuang@nchu.edu.tw,04-22840290 # 412。

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU/NCHU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback