|摘要: || 任何政策的制定與推動，必然有其背景緣由。自2000年「金融機構合併法」與2001年「金融控股公司法」陸續上路後，正式開啟金融機構整併的風潮，進而興起「一次購足」的消費型態，使得跨業行銷儼然成形。而2002年財政部所倡導之「金融人員專業證照制度」，其重要性與必要性意味著既有證照考試模式與方式，將更為制度化、專業化。|
Any policy formulation and promotion, must have its reasons background. Since 2000, "The Financial Institutions Merger Act" and 2001, "Financial Holding Company Act" after another on the road, the official opening wave of consolidation of financial institutions, and thus the rise of "one stop shopping" patterns of consumption, making the cross-industry marketing is thus formed. Advocated by the Ministry of Finance in 2002 the "Professional Financial Certification System", and the importance and necessity means that both the certification exam pattern and methods will be more institutionalized and professionalized.
"Professional Financial Certification System" implementation is determined by the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance and other handling units to be responsible for examination affairs matters; However, the system has promoted many of the problems derived so far, these voices of opposition to the review, big government''s management thinking, taking little government''s implementation of the concept of apparent contradictions. Therefore in that if by the Ministry of Examination for uniform handling, or is it to the market mechanism to operate, open to other units to handle, could solve the crux of the existing problems, which this study is to delve into place, hoping further making specific recommendations and practices.
Accordingly, this study through the "secondary data analysis" and "in-depth interviews", based Owen(2007)proposed including proactive evaluation, clarificative evaluation, interactive evaluation, monitoring evaluation, impact evaluation of five different types of evaluation, and Dunn(2008)proposed the adequacy, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, responsiveness and appropriateness of such six policy evaluation criteria and indicators to analyze the "Professional Financial Certification System" contracting out of the related basis in law, to promote the cause and the implementation factors, whether participatory mechanisms, promotion process and the effectiveness of the process and so on, exploring policy-oriented, implementation of-oriented and results-oriented, and then collate and analyze the findings.
Finally, this study based on the findings, develop nine policy recommendations for future policy reference, and put forward follow-up recommendations, providing future researchers can further exploration.